Performance & Capability Assessment
Replace subjective reviews with evidence of applied capability
Replace opinions with evidence. Nano Masters AI assesses applied capability through realistic scenarios and consistent scoring — across roles, teams, and locations. Use defensible scorecards to identify gaps, benchmark performance, and support promotions, succession, and development decisions with confidence.
For HRBPs, talent leaders, and business executives making promotion, succession, or capability decisions — especially where calibration and defensibility matter.
Coach can be disabled for strict evaluation
Comparable scorecards across roles and cohorts
Supports calibration sessions and talent reviews
Gap patterns and development priorities by role
Typical pilot: role setup → simulation → scorecards. Fast, measurable, shareable.
Works for training and assessment—enable or disable the AI Coach per course.
Problem
Performance reviews can be subjective and inconsistent. Leaders lack comparable evidence of applied capability, making promotions and succession decisions risky and hard to defend.
Outcome
Defensible people decisions using scenario evidence: clearer benchmarks, fairer calibration, targeted development priorities, and measurable progress over time.
What you get
Outcomes
- Assess real capability, not self-reports or gut feel
- Standardize performance signals across managers and teams
- Identify skill gaps by role with clear next steps
- Support promotions and succession with defensible evidence
- Track progress over time with comparable benchmarks
How it works
Process
1
Choose what to measure
Select competencies, KPIs, and risk factors relevant to the role.
2
Run scenario assessments
Participants complete realistic decision tasks aligned to your standards.
3
Generate evidence
Get scorecards, signals, and structured summaries for calibration and action.
4
Take action
Use results for development plans, readiness decisions, and benchmarking over time.
Use cases
Where teams apply this solution in real organizations.
Pinpoint gaps by role, team, and location using scenario evidence.
Standardized signals for talent decisions using comparable scenario evidence.
Prove what changed—before vs after—using the same scenario benchmark.
Assess applied capability and consistency before promotion decisions using realistic scenarios and rubrics.
Reveal specific skill gaps and targeted coaching priorities by role using scenario evidence.
Standardize evaluation across sites with the same scenarios and thresholds for comparable benchmarking.
Want a tailored version for your industry?
We generate simulations, assessments, and scorecards for your roles in days.