Interview consistency
Structured interview calibration
Before interviews begin, align interviewers on what “good” looks like. Shared scenarios and rubrics reduce variance, improve fairness, and make feedback comparable across interviewers and regions.
Problem
Interview outcomes vary by interviewer. Without calibration, teams disagree on standards and decisions become slower and more subjective.
Outcome
More consistent interviews, reduced bias and noise, and faster alignment on finalists using shared evidence.
FAQ
Common questions
Interviewers score shared scenarios against the same rubric, then compare interpretations and align on standards.
Often—because interviewers focus on verified gaps and avoid redundant questioning.
Yes—rubrics can map to your competency model and hiring bar definitions.
Yes—especially where regional norms can drive inconsistent evaluations.
Want this use case tailored to your roles?
We generate scenarios, decision points, and scorecards in days.